Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Global Health ; 17(1): 13, 2021 01 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067247

ABSTRACT

Lockdowns can be an effective pandemic response strategy that can buy much needed time to slow disease transmission and adequately scale up preventative, diagnostic, and treatment capacities. However, the broad restrictive measures typically associated with lockdowns, though effective, also comes at a cost - imposing significant social and economic burdens on individuals and societies, especially for those in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Like most high-income countries (HICs), many LMICs initially adopted broad lockdown strategies for COVID-19 in the first wave of the pandemic. While many HICs experiencing subsequent waves have returned to employing lockdown strategies until they can receive the first shipments of COVID-19 vaccine, many LMICs will likely have to wait much longer to get comparable access for their own citizens. In leaving LMICs vulnerable to subsequent waves for a longer period of time without vaccines, there is a risk LMICs will be tempted to re-impose lockdown measures in the meantime. In response to the urgent need for more policy development around the contextual challenges involved in employing such measures, we propose some strategies LMICs could adopt for safe and responsible lockdown entrance/exit or to avoid re-imposing coercive restrictive lockdown measures altogether.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Developing Countries , Quarantine , COVID-19/epidemiology , Global Health , Health Equity , Health Policy , Humans , Public Health Practice/ethics
2.
J Bioeth Inq ; 17(4): 549-553, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-728233

ABSTRACT

Our initial response to COVID-19 has been plagued by a series of failures-many of which have extended inequity within and across populations, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The global health governance of pandemic preparedness and response needs to move further away from the advocacy of a one-size-fits-all approach that tends to prioritize the interests of high-income countries towards a context-sensitive approach that gives equity a central role in guiding our pandemic preparedness and response strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care/ethics , Global Health/ethics , International Cooperation , Intersectoral Collaboration , Pandemics/ethics , Social Justice , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Government , Humans , Moral Obligations , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL